What Is the Difference Between Relative Income & Absolute Income?
Original post by Tom Gresham of Demand Media
The difference between relative income and absolute income centers on the issue of context. Relative income measures your income in relation to other members of society, weighing it against the standards of the day. Absolute income, meanwhile, does not take into consideration those other factors, but simply reflects the total amount of earnings you've received in a given period.
Economist John Maynard Keynes created a theory of consumption based on people's absolute income. According to Keynes, consumers would spend a smaller percentage of their income as their absolute income grew larger, simultaneously increasing their savings rate. Data supported the theory, but when aggregate income grew there was not a similar growth in the aggregate savings rate. Still, standard economics asserts that individuals view their income and financial position in absolute terms.
James Duesenberry introduced the relative income hypothesis, which demonstrats that people make decisions, including savings and consuming, based not on on absolute income but on relative income. Duesenberry argued that consumers view their own position in relation to others, and behave accordingly. For instance, a consumer will consider his income as it relates to others before making purchase decisions.
Income and Well-Being
Many economists argue that absolute income is the best measurement of an individual's well-being. However, research indicates that measures of happiness have remained the same when the population's absolute income grows at a similar rate. But the wealthy population shows higher levels of happiness than the poorer population. This evidence suggests that relative income is critical to our happiness and well-being. Absolute income has been linked to increased social tolerance, a cleaner environment and better health.
Contemporary Income Growth
Absolute income and relative income have diverged considerably in their measurements of income growth in the U.S. since the 1970s. Absolute income has grown at a much higher rate than median family earnings in the U.S., owing to increased income inequality in the country. This means that the portion of the population not in the highest earnings brackets has seen its relative income decrease even as its absolute income climbs.
- International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences; Relative Income Hypothesis; Levent Kockesen
- Relative Income Position and Performance; Benno Torgler, Sascha Schmidt and Bruno Frey; January 2006
- New York Times; Income and Happiness: An Imperfect Link; Robert Frank; March 2008
About the Author
Tom Gresham is a freelance writer and public relations specialist who has been writing professionally since 1999. His articles have appeared in the "Washington Post," "Virginia Magazine," "Vermont Magazine," "Adirondack Life" and the "Southern Arts Journal," among other publications. He graduated from the University of Virginia.